| Beyond balancing our visual world, compositional elements, (see our bibliography and related web sites, especially the Pomona College site, for more information about visual elements) such as line, shape, and directional axis, inform our other perceptions as well. For example, the texture of a plant which could be prickly or rough, such as is found on a cactus or the bark of a tree, may tell us not to eat that plant. | ![]() |
We perceive the plant's texture without having to taste or touch
it. In a more complex instance, when an artist includes a directional
line through the center of a painting or a large shape on the
side of a sculpture, the artist is prompting the viewer to follow
the line through the painting or look immediately to the side
of the sculpture. In all academic fields, as well as everyday
life, we are constantly negotiating with visual information, making
visual literacy a key aspect of intelligence.
Teaching compositional elements to children allows them to read
and better understand the visual messages in their world. There
are three levels of visual information that we perceive: physical,
perceptual, and conceptual. Physical realities are objectively
factual - a maple tree has green leaves, a cat's fur has a smooth,
soft texture, a pen is smaller than a computer. Not everything
that we see has a physical reality that is tangible and thus our
brain "fills in" the missing information. For example,
we may read a portion of a television screen as one color, when
our brain is actually blending several pigments together to create
a single color in our minds. This is the second type of vision - perceptual. Interpreting visual information
allowing one to understand meaning in information is the conceptual, the final tier of visual information. Conceptual messages may be as simple as understanding that someone
is choking because of their gesture, even though they can't speak,
or as complex as interpreting a work of art. Visual literacy
is achieved through intepreting visual messages of all types and
understanding their inherent and subjective messages.
Physical Reality
The ability to see physical details in images, such as those found in science, aid in the categorizing of visual information by learning to see differences and similarities between physical elements. Science images contain physical realities that are not unlike compositional elements found in art, such as the shape of a cloud or the number of segments and legs on an insect. The skills of perception used to distinguish physical realities may be used to differentiate parasites under a microscope. For example, when categorizing ants into taxonomic groups, the same compositional elements found in a work of art are found in nature. Ants can be distinguished by their hue, shape and number of their segmented body parts, direction and shape of their legs, and texture of their exoskeletons.
|
For example, ants of the Formicae group, a type of Japanese ant, all have two smaller segments in the centers of their bodies, with large posterior and anterior segments. The anterior segments, or heads, have the same upside-down heart shape. All of their antennae have one bend at their center. Within the Formicae group, the ants are distinguished by color, overall size, and their varying textures. |
These physical realities are objective facts seen by all. The
ability to differentiate between physical realities forms the
first stage of visual literacy.
Perception
Compositional elements in works of art do not necessarily have
to be physical realities, the way they must be in real objects
and beings, such as ants. For example, if asked "What color
is Claude Monet's painting Waterloo Bridge, London at Dusk?"
most people would reply "Green."

The majority of the water and sky are green. However, the pigments
used for the bridge are various hues of blues, grays and bits
of white, which is the focus of the painting. Why do most see
this painting as green? Green dominates the background, silhouetting
the bridge. Although the water and sky have flecks of white,
reds, pinks, yellows and blues, green is the dominant color because
Monet combined many of the other colors to suggest green. Yellow
and blue combine to make green and when they stand alone, they
enhance the green because they are part of the same color family.
Monet's whites are not pure white, but have touches of green.
Only the red hues stand in opposition to green, and these are
used sparingly. Therefore, our perception of this painting has
been skewed to see green, when in fact their are hundreds of hues
of the basic colors used.
|
The majority of compositional elements are not complete forms
or colors but mere suggestions which shape our perceptions forcing
us to see dominant elements in a work. The Cezanne painting used
for the second example in the practice exercises does not in fact
have a diagonal line running across the center of the canvas.
However, we perceive that it does. Cezanne created a shadow there with slightly darker hues, which creates a gully in the hillside. The viewer perceives this gully as a line drawing our eye up (or down) the hill, although no line exists. | ![]() |
Conceptual Seeing
In examining compositional elements the savvy viewer will not stop with delineating the formal characteristics in a work of art, he or she will search for meaning. Compositional elements convey meaning by telling our brains where to look, forcing us to read a work of art. Let us take for example Man Ray's Indestructible Object.
|
This work is a metronome with a picture of an eye paper-clipped
to the metre-stick. Formally, the piece prompts you to look at
the eye because it is looking at you. Unlike a more traditional
work of art without movable parts, the eye moves constantly on
the metre-stick so the directional element of the piece also forces
us to move with it. The flimsiness of the magazine clipping with
the eye contrasts with the solid construction of the metronome.
The most obvious aspect of the composition is that both objects
are found objects - Man Ray needed only to put them together,
he did not actually construct either the metronome or the photograph
of the eye. |
Man Ray's title prompts us to imagine what might be indestructible in
this work. The metronome is less destructible than the picture
of the eye. Even a real eye seems more fragile than the metronome.
The concept of vision, however, is more permanent. Even if one
person is blinded, another will always be able to see and, therefore,
witness our actions. Similarly, the metronome itself could be
destroyed, however, the rhythym that it measures is also permanent.
The permanence of vision and rhythym are echoed in the formal
aspects of the piece because as viewers we have difficulty taking
our sights off of the moving eye. The destructability of the
metronome and the magazine clipping of the eye are highlighted
by the fact that Man Ray did not make either object, but found
each. They are manufactured objects, which like most objects
made in the 20th century, will decay, break or be replaced.
Children may not, of course, read all of the meanings just discussed
in such a complex work as Indestructible Object. However,
compositional elements will help them to explain the stories that
they read in works of art. Though they may not understand the
social context reflected in a painting or sculpture, they will
see the subtle relationships between people or objects in a work
because of formal elements. As they become more sophisticated
in targeting these elements, they will be able to verbalize why
they read a painting in a particular way which is the ultimate
goal of visual literacy.
Dondis, Donis A. A Primer of Visual Literacy, 1973, The Massachusetts Insititue of Technology.
Arnheim, Rudolf. Visual Thinking, 1969, The University of California Press.
Neill, William. By Nature's Design, 1993, Chronicle Books.